Dynamic Logics of Evidence-Based Beliefs
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper adds evidence structure to standard models of belief, in the form of families of sets of worlds. We show how these more fine-grained models support natural actions of “evidence management”, ranging from update with external new information to internal rearrangement. We show how this perspective leads to new richer languages for existing neighborhood semantics for modal logic. Our main results are relative completeness theorems for the resulting dynamic logic of evidence.
منابع مشابه
Bridges between Dynamic Doxastic and Doxastic Temporal Logics
Analyzing the behavior of agents in a dynamic environment requires describing the evolution of their knowledge as they receive new information. But equally crucial are agents’ beliefs over time, since most of our decisions and actions involve uncertainty, from going to work to selling shares. Beliefs, too, are information-based, and when refuted, they have to be revised in systematic ways. Thes...
متن کامل(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare
Recent years have witnessed a parallel and seemingly contradictory trend towards both the standardization and the customization of healthcare and medical treatment. Here, we explore what is meant by ‘standardization’ and ‘customization’ in healthcare settings and explore the implications of these changes for healthcare delivery. We frame the paradox of these divergent and opposing factors in te...
متن کاملChapter 10 BDI Logics
This paper presents an overview of so-called BDI logics, logics where the notion of Beliefs, Desires and Intentions play a central role. Starting out from the basic ideas about BDI by Bratman, we consider various formalizations in logic, such as the approach of Cohen and Levesque, slightly remodelled in dynamic logic, Rao & Georgeff’s influential BDI logic based on the branching-time temporal l...
متن کاملProviders and Patients Caught Between Standardization and Individualization: Individualized Standardization as a Solution; Comment on “(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare”
In their 2017 article, Mannion and Exworthy provide a thoughtful and theory-based analysis of two parallel trends in modern healthcare systems and their competing and conflicting logics: standardization and customization. This commentary further discusses the challenge of treatment decision-making in times of evidence-based medicine (EBM), shared decision-making and personalized medicine. From ...
متن کاملDynamic Logics of Evidence-Based Belief
It is generally accepted that a rational belief must be grounded in the evidence available to an agent. However, there is much less agreement about the precise relationship between an agent’s beliefs and her evidence. Understanding this complex mechanism raises many interesting philosophical and technical issues. Modeling evidence requires richer structures than found in standard epistemic sema...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Studia Logica
دوره 99 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011